51¶ŻÂț

Feedback: Come back and take this hurt off me

Miracle cures from welfare bureaucrats, when speech recognition goes bad, thrifty homeopaths, and more

Come back and take this hurt off me

WHAT can explain a in Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet on 1 December? Evert Stefansson had both legs amputated as a result of diabetes. A powered wheelchair would improve the quality of his life, so he applied to the Södermanland local authority for funds. Reader Lars Gislen translates the official response as “The handicap does not seem to be permanent”. (The council soon apologised for the “unfortunate wording”.)

Meanwhile, in London, Rikki Jodelko was registered blind in 1973, as a result of retinitis pigmentosa. He is a musician, works in computer programming, and for help with mobility claims Disability Living Allowance – whose administration has been privatised to the company ATOS.

In October, he was told that he must go to an approved optician and must take a copy of his “eyecare plan”. Told, that is, in a letter – on paper. How helpful. And opticians are being required to confirm blindness, for money, which is thereby not saved.

Of course, medical decisions should be taken in the best interests of the patient, so there must be a medical rather than a financial basis for these stories. Perhaps, Rikki suggests, “we should be told more about these developments that can make the lame walk and the blind see”.

Petzplus Super Plush Toys “help with separation anxiety when your dog is left home alone” and are “for supervised use only”. So, Peta Lee asks, are they for astral-travelling owners?

Wow me the say

ADVANCES in technology continue to produce amazing new ways to make mistakes. Take the Siri speech recognition software on the newest Apple iPhone. Jim Woodgett an impressive example. “When setting an appointment for next week I told Siri ’10 am this Monday, meeting with Irene’. When I tapped to confirm, it added the appointment into iCal – and emailed a meeting request with the title ‘Mating with Irene’. Irene has yet to reply – but I suspect she has left the country.”

Lazy Monday afternoon

A READER who had better be anonymous was one of several recently to inform us about “quantum fruitloopery of the highest order” at . We replied that we had been there and done that (26 March 2011). “Dang,” the reader replied, “I’ll try again after (or perhaps before?) I perfect my time machine.”

And then another thought struck him: “Would superluminal neutrinos be perfect for those needing to shave microseconds off transatlantic trading?” (1 October 2011, p 24).

Never mind putting that in Feedback, we suggested, let’s form a “Ponzi Pyramid” marketing franchise now! “See, this is precisely why I’m not rich,” was the response, followed by: “Yes, this is a very dull teleconference I’m in. What makes you ask?”

The virtual meeting went on, and on, until our reader’s correspondence concluded with, “I am now the proud owner of – I have no idea why”. A visit will tell you, and we wish the site well.

You’d better believe it

WHEN “the homeopathy crowd see “, writes Carl Zetie, “their heads will explode”. It proposes that “Homeopathic remedies are prepared by mixing an ingredient with distilled water, shaking the container, pouring out 90 per cent
 and repeating
 So if you don’t use it all, you can make it even better than new!”

We like the testimonials, particularly this one: “I was worried, as the potency increased 10 times with each Replenishing, that I might overdose. But I found that as my hypochondriacal diseases became resistant to the standard doses
 the increase was exactly what I needed to keep them suppressed.”

Stop what you’re doing

OBTAINING permission to use others’ images (or big chunks of their words) is, as all researchers know, important. You may have to email Dr Frankenstein six times before he responds with a licence to reproduce a diagram of his interesting apparatus; but you’d want him to do the same for you.

Failure to do so can have very strange results. John Toner of the National Union of Journalists mentions writing to the German Nazi party warning them against distributing postcards made with a union member’s photograph. Or
 what? “Or we will pursue them for punitive damages for breach of copyright,” John concludes. In the annals of anti-fascism, would it be premature to celebrate this action with a very, very small footnote?

As it turned out, German police entered party premises and seized the postcards before any were distributed.

Things are going to get better

FINALLY, mention of software for the UK’s National Health Service is likely to evoke unkind thoughts about huge, failed schemes. Some of it may, however, be underrated. Another reader who needs to remain anonymous tells us that patient record software offers hints to the user. Notably, “TIP: Pressing F6 will save the current patient.”

Just like that! Unfortunately, though, it takes a balanced approach to case management. “Pressing Ctrl + F6 will discard the patient.”