Letters archive
Join the conversation in 51¶¯Âþ's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
20 August 2025
From Emily Johnston, Sykesville, Maryland, US
Seems to me that the custom of burial would have been more practical than anything else. After all, dead bodies lying about would have smelled pretty bad after a while and attracted wildlife.
20 August 2025
From Irene Rabbitts, Addlestone, Surrey, UK
I find the claims of species de-extinction by Colossal Biosciences unconvincing, its reasons for doing it unclear for the species it is trying to resurrect, and the prospect of the development of artificial wombs a potential horror story( 19 July, p 32 ).
20 August 2025
From Derek Bolton, Sydney, Australia
Your article on how to think about the weak and strong anthropic principles (AP) took the Barrow and Tipler formulations. These conflict with the original Brandon Carter definitions, make much less sense and haven't enjoyed much peer acceptance( 28 June, p 32 ). Carter's weak AP is that within a universe capable of supporting intelligent …
27 August 2025
From John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex, UK
I look at de-extinction this way: people interested in wildlife regret extinctions, especially human-caused ones. They would like to atone. Attempts have already been made to produce, for example, aurochs-like cattle just by selective breeding. If de-extinction results in creatures that resemble extinct species and can live and thrive in the present, there is no …
27 August 2025
From Gillian Peall, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK
What are people going to do with animals that are de-extincted? They obviously aren't going to dump such valuable specimens in wild, unbounded habitats. No, they will be confined, possibly in a zoo, where they will be gawped at – sorry, marvelled at – by endless streams of humans. They will be poked, prodded, measured …
27 August 2025
From Richard Kay, Coventry, UK
1 × 10 90 seems very small compared with the useful numbers used to generate cryptography keys. Given that such numbers are routinely involved in calculations with practical real-world applications, physical reality is no constraint to going full steam ahead further towards infinity.
27 August 2025
From Sam Edge, Ringwood, Hampshire, UK
While I am aware that breastfeeding has many benefits, as highlighted in your story, I am a living testament to the alternative. I was entirely bottle-fed as a baby, my mother having had quite enough after feeding my three siblings, especially in the climate in Singapore where I was weaned. Sixty years on, I am …