IT’S a shame when the demands of the media overshadow those of science. The closely managed razzmatazz that accompanied the debut of Ida – the fossil “that could change everything” about our ancestry – ensured that everyone was talking about her for a day or two. But it also meant that no one was allowed to see the relevant paper until after the event, so there was little chance to seek disinterested comment on the researchers’ claim (see “What you should know about chiropractic”). By the time doubts about Ida’s role in our past emerged, the circus had moved on.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from 51¶¯Âþ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Health
The mysterious reason why women get hotter from age 18 to 42
51¶¯Âþ
Comment
This is the most underrated sci-fi film franchise of the 21st century
Culture
Comment
Shiver me timbers: Do we have to worry about space pirates now?
Regulars
Life
PMOS shows us why many scientific terms need to be renamed
Leader
Popular articles
Trending 51¶¯Âþ articles
1
The Selfish Gene at 50: Why Dawkins’s evolution classic still holds up
2
Mystery of the ancient giant stone jars of Laos may have been solved
3
We may finally know why dinosaurs like T. rex evolved tiny arms
4
The ‘doomsday’ glacier’s giant ice shelf is about to break away
5
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
6
Can we harness quantum effects to create a new kind of healthcare?
7
The distant world that is our best hope of finding alien life
8
After news about Oliver Sacks's "lies", we revisit his best-loved book
9
We could generate hydrogen from rocks while storing CO2 in them
10
Wind-assisted cargo ships could more than halve shipping emissions
