SHOULD scientists ever put a gloss on their data to bolster support for a “good cause”? Growing unhappiness about the Red List – the Oscars of extinction risk – underline why this is bad idea (see “Conservation’s ‘Red List’ is unscientific and often wrong”). Through the list, the International Union for Conservation of Nature has done an admirable job in alerting us to the threat of species loss, but in doing so it omitted to highlight the uncertainty in its findings. As a result, valuable resources may be going into saving the wrong species, and the list itself stands to lose…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from 51¶¯Âþ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Life
We may finally know why dinosaurs like T. rex evolved tiny arms
51¶¯Âþ
Space
The distant world that is our best hope of finding alien life
Features
Environment
Solar farm on the ocean outperforms land-based solar in Taiwan
51¶¯Âþ
Environment
Wind-assisted cargo ships could more than halve shipping emissions
51¶¯Âþ
Popular articles
Trending 51¶¯Âþ articles
1
The ‘doomsday’ glacier’s giant ice shelf is about to break away
2
Mystery of the ancient giant stone jars of Laos may have been solved
3
Why autism pioneer Uta Frith wants to dismantle the spectrum
4
We may finally know why dinosaurs like T. rex evolved tiny arms
5
Solar farm on the ocean outperforms land-based solar in Taiwan
6
The distant world that is our best hope of finding alien life
7
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
8
The 14 best science and tech documentaries of 2025 so far
9
Himalayan wolf-dog hybrids emerge as a threat to wolves and people
10
A new tectonic plate boundary could be forming in southern Africa
