On your waiting-to-read shelf? “I rarely read books not connected with my research or my own writing.” This is not restrictive, he says, “since both my research and writing span broad areas, and the books pile grows faster than I can deplete it”. He even wrote about The Da Vinci Code (Bantam, 2003). How was it? “Michael Brown can tell a good story in a formulaic fashion,” he says. “But I found his terse, breathless style annoying, and persevered because I had agreed to write about it.” Devlin reckons Brown got about half of the maths wrong, “almost certainly because he used popular sources…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from 51¶¯Âþ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending 51¶¯Âþ articles
1
Mathematicians stunned by AI's biggest breakthrough in mathematics yet
2
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
3
The Selfish Gene at 50: Why Dawkins’s evolution classic still holds up
4
Photos reveal unexpected details from the world's first atomic test
5
We may finally know why dinosaurs like T. rex evolved tiny arms
6
The distant world that is our best hope of finding alien life
7
The 3 things you need to know about protein, according to an expert
8
The ‘doomsday’ glacier’s giant ice shelf is about to break away
9
Mystery of the ancient giant stone jars of Laos may have been solved
10
Epic dreaming is leaving people exhausted and distressed



