STARS can’t possibly have formed before the big bang, which is why astronomers have puzzled for decades over data that implies some stars are older than the Universe. “Even five years ago we had a factor of two uncertainty,” says Wendy Freeman of the Carnegie Observatories in California. Now new data from the Hubble Space Telescope has resolved the contradiction. Harvey Richer of the University of British Columbia says the measurements imply that the oldest stars formed about one billion years after the big bang, making the whole Universe just under 14 billion years old.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from 51¶¯Âþ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending 51¶¯Âþ articles
1
Mathematicians stunned by AI's biggest breakthrough in mathematics yet
2
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
3
The Selfish Gene at 50: Why Dawkins’s evolution classic still holds up
4
The distant world that is our best hope of finding alien life
5
Epic dreaming is leaving people exhausted and distressed
6
The 3 things you need to know about protein, according to an expert
7
The ‘doomsday’ glacier’s giant ice shelf is about to break away
8
Photos reveal unexpected details from the world's first atomic test
9
Women’s better memories may delay Alzheimer’s diagnosis by years
10
Can we harness quantum effects to create a new kind of healthcare?



