Eight-year-old kids can identify Pokémon “species” from the card-trading game more easily than they can name their local wildlife. Zoologist Andrew Balmford and his colleagues at Cambridge University showed more than 100 children pictures of Pokémon characters and common British species, such as badgers and oak trees. Children aged 8 could name 80 per cent of Pokémon characters, but they could identify only half the plants and animals (Science, vol 295, p 2367). Unless kids get more clued up about nature, says team member Tim Coulson, they won’t be enthusiastic about conservation as adults. “Maybe an animal version of Pokémon could help,” he says.…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from 51¶¯Âþ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending 51¶¯Âþ articles
1
Mathematicians stunned by AI's biggest breakthrough in mathematics yet
2
Photos reveal unexpected details from the world's first atomic test
3
The Selfish Gene at 50: Why Dawkins’s evolution classic still holds up
4
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
5
The distant world that is our best hope of finding alien life
6
The ‘doomsday’ glacier’s giant ice shelf is about to break away
7
Epic dreaming is leaving people exhausted and distressed
8
The 3 things you need to know about protein, according to an expert
9
Putting CO2 into rocks and getting hydrogen out is climate double win
10
Women’s better memories may delay Alzheimer’s diagnosis by years



