A REPORT released this week casts doubt on the idea of “clean coal”. The
report, written by Sydney-based independent energy consultant Mark Ellis, also
criticises the large allocation of Australian government funds to coal
projects—about $80 million per year, it estimates. Ellis was
commissioned to write the report, called Can coal be clean?, by the community
group Aidwatch. It argues that improved technologies for burning coal might
actually increase carbon dioxide emissions as well as being costly. Fluidised
bed combustion and advanced pulverised fuel technologies will increase carbon
emissions and costs, Ellis says. Some other approaches, such as using gas or
solar energy, would reduce emissions but increase costs. The only approach that
saves money as well as fuel is improving the efficiency of using energy. Ellis’
report is available from Aidwatch, PO Box 652 Woollahra 2025, NSW.
More from 51¶¯Âþ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending 51¶¯Âþ articles
1
Mathematicians stunned by AI's biggest breakthrough in mathematics yet
2
The distant world that is our best hope of finding alien life
3
Photos reveal unexpected details from the world's first atomic test
4
We may finally know why dinosaurs like T. rex evolved tiny arms
5
The Selfish Gene at 50: Why Dawkins’s evolution classic still holds up
6
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
7
The 3 things you need to know about protein, according to an expert
8
Putting CO2 into rocks and getting hydrogen out is climate double win
9
Mystery of the ancient giant stone jars of Laos may have been solved
10
CAR T-cell therapy bolstered by stiffening up cancer cells first



