In Science as a Questioning Process (Institute of Physics, £20, ISBN 0
7503 0369 7), astrophysicist Nigel Sanitt puts forward a stiff new test for
scientific theories: stated simply, any theory worth the name has to answer more
questions than it raises. Using a process he calls zetetic analysis, he shows,
for instance, that Darwinism was not a proper theory, though Neo-Darwinism is.
For good measure, he crams in some reflections on the lack of certainty in
science and its close resemblance to literature.
More from 51¶¯Âþ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending 51¶¯Âþ articles
1
Mathematicians stunned by AI's biggest breakthrough in mathematics yet
2
We may finally know why dinosaurs like T. rex evolved tiny arms
3
Photos reveal unexpected details from the world's first atomic test
4
The Selfish Gene at 50: Why Dawkins’s evolution classic still holds up
5
The distant world that is our best hope of finding alien life
6
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
7
The ‘doomsday’ glacier’s giant ice shelf is about to break away
8
Mystery of the ancient giant stone jars of Laos may have been solved
9
The 3 things you need to know about protein, according to an expert
10
Putting CO2 into rocks and getting hydrogen out is climate double win
