An object known as WT1190F entering Earth’s atmosphere in February 2015 was thought to potentially be a UFO, but was likely human-made debris IAC/UAE/NASA/ESA
The following is an extract from our monthly Launchpad newsletter, in which resident space expert Leah Crane journeys through the solar system, the galaxy and beyond. You can sign up for Launchpad for free here.
Aliens are in the headlines, but there still isn’t solid evidence that they’ve come to Earth. On 31 May, NASAâs new task force on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs) held its first public meeting. UAP is basically bureaucrat-speak for UFO, anything in the sky that canât immediately be traced back to an aircraft or known natural phenomenon.
NASA announced the formation of this team last year, and it has been controversial. A large portion of the public meeting was spent talking about the harassment that the team members have faced online, both from people who are certain that aliens are real and have definitely visited Earth, as well as from those who think itâs ridiculous that a government agency would investigate claims of alien craft. I have to say that I lean towards the latter position, although obviously not far enough to shout at anyone about it on the internet.
Advertisement
So far, the UAP group hasnât proved me wrong. Out of more than 800 reports of UAPs, almost all are traceable back to mundane sources â commercial aircraft, balloons, even radiation from microwave ovens. Less than 5 per cent of them remained anomalous after investigation â but not, as far as anyone can tell, because theyâre aliens.
In those cases, the data is the problem. âThere are many cases in which we might be under the impression that there might be something anomalous, where the data is just not sufficient to support an analysis that would allow us to really understand⊠the behaviour of the object,â said at the University of Delaware in a press call after the meeting. âItâs very possible that with better data they would be reconciled with known phenomena.â
That doesnât mean the group is useless, as its leader, , pointed out. âThe first step if you want to find needles in haystacks, or if you donât even know what youâre looking for, is to learn about and characterise hay really well.â So far, the team has looked at a lot of things that could have potentially been needles and found that theyâre hay, which isnât unexpected.
Free newsletter
Sign up to Launchpad
Bring the galaxy to your inbox every month, with the latest space news, launches and astronomical occurrences from 51¶ŻÂțâs Leah Crane.

David Grinspoon at the Planetary Science Institute in Arizona said something during the press call that really spoke to me: âItâs a big universe and we have to admit that there are things out there we donât understand, and in fact some of those not-well-understood phenomena may be really important clues to important mysteries that we want to understand. But if you were giving me a finite pot of resources right now to look for biosignatures and technosignatures, would I put some of those resources into studying UAPs? Personally, probably not, because we havenât seen any evidence that indicates that UAPs have anything to do with extraterrestrial phenomena.â
You may have also heard that a former US intelligence officer named David Grusch gave an interview on NewsNation alleging that the US government has retrieved ânon-human exotic origin vehicles that have either landed or crashedâ as well as the actual aliens who piloted those vehicles. Obviously, if this is true itâs a huge deal. However, Grusch didnât show any physical evidence, so while itâll be interesting to see how it plays out, for now Iâm regarding it with a major dose of scepticism.
I have to admit that personally, I doubt weâll ever find extant intelligent life. Thatâs because while we all know that space is big, we rarely think about the enormity of time. The likelihood that intelligent aliens would exist close enough to us both in space and in time for us to spot them seems so minuscule as to be unimaginable to me. So sure, let NASAâs task force characterise hay as much as they want â itâs a tiny footnote in the agencyâs budget, itâs not hurting anyone and maybe theyâll find something interesting â but when it comes to actually looking for alien life, maybe we should stick to microbes.
Topics:



