
In Cotardâs syndrome, the feeling of existence corrodes but something more fundamental does not (see âHow do I know I existâ). Even though people with this rare condition feel they donât exist, there is still an âIâ experiencing that feeling. What is that âIâ? One answer is that it may be a by-product of consciousness itself.

Read more: What is consciousness?
How your brain creates the feeling of being is the biggest problem in neuroscience. But we are coming closer to cracking it
René Descartes was convinced that the body and conscious mind are two different substances: the first is made of matter, the latter is immaterial. His ideas influenced neuroscience until a few decades ago, but the field has moved on. Today, it is widely accepted that our brains give rise to consciousness.
Advertisement
But how? That is a raging debate. At its heart is what philosopher David Chalmers at New York University termed the âhard problemâ of consciousness: how can physical networks of neurons produce experiences that appear to fall outside the material world? As Thomas Nagel, also at New York University, put it in the 1970s: you could know every detail of the physical workings of a batâs brain, but still not know what it is like to be a bat.
âYou may know beyond a doubt that you exist, but your âIâ could still be an illusionâ
Broadly speaking, those trying to solve the hard problem fall into two camps, according to psychologist and philosopher Nicholas Humphrey. There are those who think that consciousness is something real and those who say itâs a mirage, and so dismiss the problem entirely.
Mind trickery
The former camp argues that consciousness is a fundamental component of the universe, one that exists alongside matter and has properties which, perhaps conveniently, cannot be explained by our present understanding of physics. If taken to the extreme, says Chalmers, this idea can lead to panpsychism, the view that all matter â even inanimate objects like rocks â is imbued with some degree of consciousness.
Even without tackling that particular Pandoraâs box, this camp faces a daunting challenge. We know that conscious thought can influence the body. A conscious desire to move your arm results in physical movement. But the fundamentals of how this happens remain hazy.
Those on the other side say the hard problem creates one where there is none. âItâs an unsolvable mystery, because the problem is ill posed,â says neuroscientist Michael Graziano of Princeton University. He argues that consciousness is nothing but a trick of the mind. Whatâs more, the brain doesnât just create the illusion of consciousness but also the feeling that there is a separate, immaterial âIâ having a conscious experience. In other words: there is no need to explain strange interactions between material and immaterial things because the immaterial things donât really exist.
Metaphysics special: Philosophyâs biggest questions unravelled
What is reality made of? How do we know we exist, or if God exists? Join us as we test nine fundamental questions against the best scientific knowledge
Read more
For Graziano, Tufts University philosopher Daniel Dennett and other âmaterialistsâ, the real issue is not solving the hard problem but explaining how the brain accomplishes this trickery. Graziano resolves this by saying that consciousness is âthe brainâs way of describing to itself what it means to pay attention to and deeply process a signalâ.
The argument goes like this: we must pay attention to our environment to survive. As a result, our brains have become very skilled at representing the world around us. Somewhere in the course of evolution, they began representing objects as having immaterial properties, and in so doing it generated the mirage of consciousness.
Ultimately, most materialists take the view that after we die and our brains and bodies have decomposed, there is nothing left. That must mean that our prevailing sense of a separate, immaterial âIâ was also an illusion.
Which brings us back to the previous question: although you may know beyond doubt that you exist â and indeed it is very possible that you are not a simulation â the âIâ you perceive yourself to be could still be an illusion.
This article appeared in print under the headline âWhat is consciousness?â
