
Feedback is our weekly column of bizarre stories, implausible advertising claims, confusing instructions and more
Striving to name polyfailure
WHAT should we call the phenomenon exemplified by Feedbackâs perception that âanyone who suspects the probability of a set of independent failures occurring together to be vanishingly small should urgently make plans to cope with them all happening at onceâ (7 March)? So far, 21 readers have been keen to help.
Six of you suggested Murphyâs law, also known as Sodâs law: âAnything that can go wrong, will go wrong.â Bill Sloman noted the ânecessary corollary that whichever name you use for it wonât be the one used by the person you are talking toâ. Bob Malcolm was reminded of a journalist asking a UK Met Office spokesperson, in the aftermath of some weather phenomenon, âWhy canât you predict these freak events?â
Advertisement
Bob also likes the âLaw of the Inevitability of Freak Eventsâ, or LIFE. This has the advantage of being, like the original question, a bit more specific than Murphyâs law, which seems to us to be primarily about maddening individual failures. So, too, does Pat Phillipsâ suggestion of âBlack Swanâ after Nassim Talebâs book of that name about unpredictable events. Tony Rimmer may have got to the heart of the difference with his suggestion of âpolymurphismâ.
Brian Russell spots an exciting : â⊠is 420 million year old volcanic rock, finely crushed to release⊠minerals and trace elements â 100% organic!â
Portmanteau names proliferate
THE above question also led to inventive portmanteau words: in the context of untoward nuclear events that we mentioned, Ian Beaverâs âcomplacidentâ; Alex MacDonaldâs âimprobaballsâ; and Russ Carlsonâs âcoincidencalityâ. The last should, he proposes, be pronounced, improbably, âkoh-inky-dink-al-iteeâ.
Pratchettâs postulate perhaps
THE late Terry Pratchett also inspired a number of suggestions for naming the phenomenon of the inevitability of improbable combinations of events. Following some unfortunateness with a laser printer â whose tendency for multiple errors our own editor was grumbling about just the other day â and recalling , Ian Lang puts forward âThe Ratio of Omnibuggeranceâ.
Sandy Dalkin posits âRincewindâs Ruleâ, named after the hapless wizard of Pratchettâs Discworld novels, in whose experience things with a one in a million chance of happening âcrop up nine times out of 10â. He also proposes âPratchettâs Postulateâ.
Swiss-cheesology
THERE is, of course, a serious side to the analysis of polyfailure, and in the world of aviation it has a name. Pete Culman writes: âThe overall risk of an incident occurring is considered as the cumulative risk of a number of âlayersâ, each having âholesâ. The layers move with time: an incident will occur only if enough holes line up simultaneously for long enough.â The prevention of this is, by visual analogy, the study of âSwiss cheeseâ.
David Harris credits this to the psychologist . David adds, in defence of aviation in general: âObservation shows around two human errors per flight, but these proceed to an accident in fewer than one flight in a million, about one in two million hours. The biblical âthree score years and tenâ is 613,607 hours. If you spent your entire life in an airliner, youâd be unlikely to die in a crash.â
Intrepid reporter in Matrix
NOMINATIVE determinism â the notion that names influence occupations â has been celebrated by our colleague Richard Webb at the â itself a celebration of âresearch that makes people laugh, and then thinkâ.
âWhat Iâd really like,â Richard says, âis an assessment of the probability that, in the very week I am taking nominative determinism to the country, I should, at a schmoozing event at the Science Museum on my off night, be randomly approached by a stranger who turns out to be Roger Kneebone, professor of surgical education at Imperial College London, and subject of one of my slides, who subsequently ends up appearing in the show that just happens to be at Imperial College two nights later.â
This all happened in a week when the subject of 51¶ŻÂțâÈÙ cover special was chance â in which David Hand, also (no doubt coincidentally) of Imperial College, informs us that âwhat appear to be extremely improbable events occur quite oftenâ.
These would appear to be relatively benign examples of polymurphism, defined above. It leads Richard to fear that he is, in fact, living in the Matrix.
Alatrism spawns apatheism
ALATRISM is defined, largely by Feedback, as ânot bothering to worship any deities, regardless of how many there may beâ (21 March). Carl Zetie suggests it âappears to be somewhat related to apatheism, defined as âreally not caring whether or not there is a god or godsâ.â Perhaps one might say that apatheism is to alatrism as atheism is to agnosticism?
The best part about being an apatheist, Carl says, âis that it annoys militant atheists and religious fundamentalists in equal measureâ.
Ban this vile instrument!
FINALLY, and still considering untoward events, Nigel Perry has a plea. âAlmost every day we read that certain vile instruments have been used for drug dealing, child abuse, fraud and countless other felonies. Please support my campaign for a ban on industrial scales.â