WHAT is the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe and everything? In The Hitchhikerâs Guide to the Galaxy, aliens build a city-sized computer to find out. They are dismayed when it turns out, bafflingly, to be 42. The problem, the unrepentant computer suggests, is that they never really knew the question⊠and to find it they will need an even bigger computer.
Like all the best comedy, Douglas Adamsâs absurdity has an element of truth to it â perhaps more than you might expect. We already have machines that answer our questions in ways we canât fully appreciate: from quantum computers, whose physics remains opaque, to data-crunching black boxes that translate languages and recognise faces despite knowing nothing of grammar or physiology (51¶ŻÂț, 10 August 2013, p 32).
But despite their complexity, these computers are all of the type conceived by Alan Turing in 1936 â and they all have the same limitations. Turing showed that any computer predicated on human logic alone will struggle with the same questions that we do. They will always find some questions undecidable: not so much âcomputer says âno'â as âcomputer says âcan never know'â.
Advertisement
But Turing also conceived of an âoracleâ that might transcend those limitations. Most computer scientists donât think we can ever build one. But a few people are trying, using neural networks (see âTuringâs oracle: The computer that goes beyond logicâ). If they succeed, we will gain new insights into thought itself â and perhaps into the human brain, whose staggering computational prowess remains deeply mysterious (see âDefending the grand vision of the Human Brain Projectâ).
Conventional computers give us the answers to questions that we can articulate, but donât have the time to calculate. Turingâs oracle could address issues we canât even articulate: an echo of Adamsâs âeven bigger computerâ. It might not provide answers to life, the universe and everything, but even futile attempts to make one could help explain how we think about them â and figure out the right questions to ask.
This article appeared in print under the headline âDeep thoughtsâ
