51¶ŻÂț

The unluckiest pig in the world, and more

Danger: airborne turtles

BLAMING Canada geese for forcing a US Airways jet to ditch in the Hudson river seems logical. They’re big enough to cause serious damage to any plane that hits them, and thousands have settled around New York City. Sure enough, when we checked the Federal Aviation Administration’s National Wildlife Strike Database at , Canada geese were high on the list, with 1266 reports of them hitting aircraft between 1990 and 2008, 103 of which were in New York State.

With all three New York City airports close to the ocean, gulls also seemed likely suspects and, yes, over the same period, 1208 gull strikes were reported in New York, out of a total of 9843 gulls that collided with planes across the US. Further scrutiny of the list revealed that other collision victims include 145 bald eagles and 15 black-capped chickadees. An endangered whooping crane was hit in Wisconsin. We began to think that nothing that flies is safe. Then we spotted an entry for turtles.

One can imagine circumstances in which turtles could become airborne, although not of the turtle’s volition. It would, however, seem quite hard to hit a plane with a tossed turtle. Yet 80 turtles suffered this fate, including 23 in New York State. The turtles weren’t alone. Armadillos are, if anything, even less aerodynamic than turtles, yet planes struck 14 of them in Florida, two in Louisiana and one in Oklahoma, although Texas armadillos successfully avoided aircraft. In addition, 13 American alligators hit planes in Florida.

We can report that our mental picture of airborne armadillos, alligators and turtles did not survive long. We were forced to conclude that although the FAA doesn’t specify it, these animals had their collisions with aircraft on the ground, presumably during take-off and landing. It was interesting to note, though, that some terrestrial species seem much better at dodging planes than others. No one reported hitting wolves, bears, sheep or goats, but the toll included 811 deer, 310 coyotes, 146 skunks, 146 foxes, 33 domestic dogs, 18 domestic cats, eight cattle, six moose, five horses, two river otters, and a single unfortunate pig.

Eat these and die

BEST correction of the year so far comes from the UK south coast paper the Bognor Regis and Chichester Guardian.

“Don’t eat these!” screamed the headline, over a note explaining that, “in last week’s cookery column entitled ‘Have fun with fungi’, we inadvertently published this photograph of the beautiful but deadly poisonous fly agaric mushroom
 Apologies for any confusion that may have ensued”.

The correction is particularly appropriate given the wording of the original story, which accompanied a colour picture of fly agaric (Amanita muscaria), the classic “witch’s mushroom” with its bright red cap dotted with white spots.

“Have fun with fungi – and lose weight fast,” encouraged the headline, over the news that “new research shows that mushrooms are also an effective diet aid
 The principle is simple: swap meat with mushrooms for four meals a week, and watch the weight slip away
 you won’t be left hankering after sinful snacks later in the day.”

Indeed. Amanita muscaria is a powerful and toxic hallucinogen that can be fatal if taken in large doses. Eating it in four meals per week will very likely leave the diner too spaced out, too sick or too dead to consider any sinful snacks.

“The label on the Roundup weedkiller purchased by Geoff Palmer warned him: “Avoid contact with the environment”

How not to right click

THE mother of a friend of Dave Higginbottom was trying to get the hang of her daughter’s computer. After a while, she shouted to her daughter: “What do you do when a squiggly red line appears under a word?”

“Just right-click,” replied her daughter from the next room.

A moment later the mother replied: “I’ve written ‘click’ but it makes no difference. I just get the word ‘click’ after the word with the squiggly line.”

What Darwin didn’t say – competition

FINALLY, don’t forget to send in your entries to our competition in honour of the 200th anniversary of Darwin’s birthday. Feedback invites readers to provide 50 words on the thought-provoking theme of: “Things you would never have heard Charles Darwin say about evolution.” The editors will reward what we judge the wittiest non-Darwinisms with the framed original of the beautiful artwork in “Uprooting Darwin’s tree” on page 35 of our 24 January issue, signed by the artist Yulia Brodskaya.

You may enter the competition by email – with the subject line “Darwin competition”, please – or by fax or post or at www.newscientist.com/article/dn16399. The competition closes on Monday 16 February. The winning entry and the best runners-up will be published here on 7 March.