The UK public resoundingly rejected the case for growing and eating genetically modified food on Wednesday.
The emphatic snub comes in a report announcing results of the UK governmentâs âGM Nationâ public debate on the future for GM foods.
It sums up feedback from 1200 letters and more than 600 public meetings attended by at least 8000 British people since June 2003.
Advertisement
The news comes at a time when British and other European governments are coming under increasing international pressure â particularly from the US â to lift a five-year moratorium on the growing and approval of GM crops.
The document, along with major scientific and economic evaluations of GM crops published earlier in summer 2003 and forthcoming results of field trials, will help inform the UK governmentâs decision on whether to end moratorium on the commercial growing of GM crops later in 2003
Hijacked meetings
Key messages from the report included:
 British people are generally uneasy about GM
 Finding out more simply deepened peopleâs concerns
 Few people support early commercialization, with more than half attending the debates saying they never wanted GM crops grown in the UK
 Widespread mistrust of government and multinational companies
 People want to know more, and crave a âcorpus of agreed âfactsâ accepted by all organisations and interestsâ
 Developing countries have special interests, but fairer trade rules would do more to eliminate hunger than GM crops
The only solace in the report for supporters of GM crops was some evidence that opponents âhijackedâ public meetings and sent most of the letters â so skewing the outcome. Observers at meetings counted five opponents for every supporter or neutral person who attended.
The report acknowledges this phenomenon. Websites run by groups opposed to GM crops, such as the National Federation of Womenâs Institutes, had urged members to attend meetings in force, for example. And the report identifies middle-aged mothers as displaying the most âimplacableâ opposition.
Hardened views
But views were trenchant even among 77 âimpartialâ participants chosen for a special âsurvey-within-a-surveyâ. This survey aimed to tease out differences between committed, self-selecting individuals who attend meetings and the âsilent majorityâ, says the report.
Many âimpartialsâ who started out undecided hardened their views against GM foods after they had had two weeks to âimmerse themselvesâ in the subject â although their sources were not always impartial.
âMost people relied on secondary reports of research, often from interested parties, without checking back to see if the research had been reported accurately,â says the report.