51

Bioscience journals ‘too dry’ say linguists

When it comes to language, biomedical journals are a sensory wasteland devoid of words that engage the senses, an analysis finds

TALK about dry. Have you ever thought that reading biomedical journals is like “a long journey through a colourless, flat terrain devoid of prominent features”?

That’s the conclusion of a linguistic study by Raul Rodriguez-Esteban of Columbia University in New York and Andrey Rzhetsky at the University of Chicago. They compared the occurrence of sensory words – such as those for colours and textures – in 78 journals with language used by Reuters news service, Wikipedia, Edgar Allan Poe, William Shakespeare and Walt Whitman.

Whitman and Reuters came top, while the journals only managed about one-fifth of their score (The EMBO Journal, ).

Rzhetsky says using more sensory words would make biomedical papers easier to understand. Peter Griffiths of the Plain English Campaign agrees: “If you get the senses involved, it tends to make things much clearer.”

“Using more sensory words would make biomedical papers easier to understand”

However, Athar Yawar, a senior editor at The Lancet, thinks that any change would require a rethink of scientific method to incorporate sensory experience as well as its usual abstract concepts.