WE HAVE yet to set up home on another world. The sheer logistics of such a move are far from understood, and no one knows if we could afford to go anyway. But that didnât stop participants at the International Astronautical Congress in Hyderabad, India, last week from discussing how such bases should be governed.
Just donât call people living on the moon or Mars âcolonistsâ. M. Y. S. Prasad, deputy director of the Space Applications Centre in Ahmedabad, says the word âcoloniesâ evokes unpleasant memories of European settlers, so Indian scientists prefer to say âhabitation basesâ.
âThe word âcoloniesâ evokes unpleasant memories of European settlers in Indiaâ
Advertisement
Democracy should be the political system of choice, and there should be no need for individuals to own property, says William Marshall of NASAâs Ames Research Center. Marshall proposes a seven-point system for government on the moon. First, he advocates e-voting; second, a jury system; third, an âupper houseâ to consider the long-term needs of lunar society. Fourth, he advocates âwikipoliticsâ â a method of utilising information gathered from a range of sources to reduce redundancy.
Point five, Marshall says, is the use of analytical politics to ensure rational decisions are made to improve the society; six is the use of historical checks to prevent society from repeating its mistakes. The final point calls for âfeedback loopsâ aimed at improving efficiency.
Such a governance system on the moon âcould offer tremendous opportunity for political reformâ, says Marshall, which could in turn produce âhuge benefitsâ if it inspired change on Earth.
Ji Wu, director of Chinaâs Centre for Space Science and Applied Research in Beijing listed the reasons why China was interested in establishing lunar and Martian bases, including mining natural resources. But finally, he said, itâs âbecause we just want to be thereâ.
Sputnikâs Legacy â Learn more about humanityâs first 50 years in space in our .