“The IAU vote is a muddled compromise that will not settle the question of ‘What is a planet?’ Pluto is not a ‘planet’ according to resolution 1, but it is a ‘dwarf planet’ by resolution 2. So is it a ‘planet’? I thought so before and think so now.â€
Andrew Cheng of Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (SpaceDaily.com, 29 August)
“It’s an awful definition; it’s sloppy science and it would never pass peer review. I have nothing but ridicule for this decision.â€
Advertisement
Alan Stern, who leads NASA’s New Horizons mission to Pluto (BBC online, 25 August)
“Many astrologers believe that Pluto’s effects were seen in charts done centuries ago, even from the 1600s – effects that were mapped out more fully only after Pluto was discovered.â€
Adel Ather, owner of an astrology studio in Toronto, Canada, claims that the new status of Pluto will not change its supposed “powerful†influence (Ottawa Citizen, Canada, 25 August)
“Western astrology uses Pluto as a planet while Pluto was always out of Indian astrology and we do not use it in our calculations.â€
Astrologer Mangal Prasad concurs that the reclassification will not affect Indian astrology, though for the opposite reason (Kerala online, 29 August)
“I’m not sure the discussion is finished. There are T-shirts selling on the internet proclaiming ‘Pluto IS a planet’.â€
Dava Sobel, author and member of the planet definition committee appointed by the International Astronomical Union (New Zealand Herald, 29 August)